The order explains that, at least since February 2019, when her daughter was 16 years old, the defendant knew that her partner was subjecting her to the sexual practices described in the document, but “she did nothing to [as] avoid”, “in defiance of her duty, as a mother, to protect her, to care for her and to help her”.
“Instead, she ordered her daughter to go to the defendant’s room in order to be subjected to sexual acts”, says the MP, highlighting that the mother “never went to the room or prevented, by any means, their implementation “.
According to the MP, the defendant also recorded, with his cell phone, on several occasions, sexual acts to which he subjected the victim, then aged 17.
The victim ended up leaving the couple’s house, “because she could no longer tolerate such acts”.
The MP highlights that the stepdaughter saw the defendant “as a father, who was in her care and custody, as well as in her economic dependence”, and placed trust in him.
For the MP, the man acted “always with a repeated and persistent desire to satisfy his libidinous instincts, knowing that he was undermining the free development of the personality and freedom in terms of sexuality” of his stepdaughter, “as well as putting her feelings into crisis.” of modesty and shame” of this.
As for the mother, the MP recalls, among other aspects, that she knew that her partner abused her daughter and, despite his duty to protect her, “encouraged and consented” to sexual acts.
By acting in this way, she allowed her partner to force her daughter to “endure and maintain” sexual acts against her will, “through feelings of intimidation, fear and shame”.
The trial, by a collective court, is scheduled to begin on the 21st of Miao.
